News & Commentary

10:25 AM
Chris Sullivan, Courion Corporation
Chris Sullivan, Courion Corporation
Commentary
50%
50%

It Takes Intelligence to Close the Identity and Access Management Gap

Banks have been the Holy Grail for hackers, thieves and disgruntled ex-employees for centuries. Yet somehow, the security burden keeps growing.

The challenge for banks has always been ensuring the right people have the right access to the right resources and do the right things with them -- this is identity and access management (IAM). The first wave of solutions in the early 2000s automated provisioning with a focus on efficiency. Organizations could on-board new employees more quickly while using fewer IT staff to do it. The second wave of solutions focused on governance, helping organizations meet increasing regulatory pressure. Still, breaches kept climbing exponentially.

The IAM Security Gap

The remaining problem is a disturbing phenomenon at the heart of every institution’s information security program: The "IAM gap."

Consider this: Actions such as on-boarding a new customer or employee, promoting a staff member, terminating a contractor, merging companies or departments, or delivering a new product all require changes in identities and access to sensitive information. How do you keep up with the constant changes?

Well, traditional IAM solutions address only part of the problem. User provisioning puts controls in place to ensure users are given only the access rights they need to do their jobs. Later – say, every three, six, nine, 12 months – organizations perform periodic reviews or certifications to validate that those access rights are in line with policy.

But here’s the problem: traditional IAM solutions don’t address the constant changes in identities, access and information stores -- billions of access relationships in most organizations -- that take place in the months between provisioning and validation. What you end up with is a huge gap that leaves an institution’s sensitive company information at risk to internal and external threats

Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Here is what the client expects us to develop...
Current Issue
Security Operations and IT Operations: Finding the Path to Collaboration
A wide gulf has emerged between SOC and NOC teams that's keeping both of them from assuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of IT systems. Here's how experts think it should be bridged.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In past years, security researchers have discovered ways to hack cars, medical devices, automated teller machines, and many other targets. Dark Reading Executive Editor Kelly Jackson Higgins hosts researcher Samy Kamkar and Levi Gundert, vice president of threat intelligence at Recorded Future, to discuss some of 2016's most unusual and creative hacks by white hats, and what these new vulnerabilities might mean for the coming year.