News

12:37 PM
Connect Directly
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Is Goldman's $27 Million FSA Fine A Call for Better Risk Management Software?

Today, the U.K.'s Financial Services Authority fined Goldman Sachs $27.1 million for "failure to ensure that it had in place adequate systems and controls to enable it to comply with its U.K. regulatory reporting obligations." Essentially, no one told the compliance department of Goldman's U.K. arm, GSI, about the SEC's investigation of Goldman's Abacus 2007-AC1 synthetic collateralized debt obligation, and therefore the compliance department did not notify the FSA, its regulator.

Today, the U.K.'s Financial Services Authority fined Goldman Sachs $27.1 million for "failure to ensure that it had in place adequate systems and controls to enable it to comply with its U.K. regulatory reporting obligations." Essentially, no one told the compliance department of Goldman's U.K. arm, GSI, about the SEC's investigation of Goldman's Abacus 2007-AC1 synthetic collateralized debt obligation, and therefore the compliance department did not notify the FSA, its regulator.

A key architect of the Abacus deal, Fabrice Tourre, transferred to the London office of GSI in November 2008, three months after the SEC's investigation began. And although the Abacus product was structured by Goldman Sachs in the U.S. (by a team that included Tourre), it was marketed in part from the U.K. to institutional investors. As an FSA authorized firm, GSI was obligated to disclose information about the SEC investigation to the FSA, the agency contends. "GSI’s systems for compliance with those obligations were inadequate to ensure that other group members would bring to its attention relevant matters which might have an impact on GSI in the U.K.," the FSA said today in a statement.

This is a warning to global banks to make sure their risk management works across country boundaries. "Compliance teams cannot afford to be geographically siloed anymore, especially if your firm is wading in international waters," says Cubillas Ding, research director at Celent. "Consequential linkages can sometimes go above and beyond what seems like domestic affair." But in spite of the FSA's characterization of this as a "systems and controls" issue, there's only so much that software can do in such cases, Ding says. "Systems and controls can handle a proportion of 'business-as-usual' type regulatory obligations, but in certain exceptional scenarios, human judgment and responsibility in both assessing and communicating the broader ramifications for the firm are essential," he says. "This is especially pertinent when staff is internationally mobile and products globally distributed."

There are software products that could do the kind of monitoring that would be necessary to alert a compliance department to a regulatory investigation at another location. According to Ding, these fall under the general category of "Enterprise Operational Risk and Compliance" and vendors include OpenPages, Oracle Mantas / Reveleus and SAS. "However, whether firms actually put such surveillance activities and technologies in place is another matter," Ding says.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Janice, I think I've got a message from the code father!
Current Issue
Security Operations and IT Operations: Finding the Path to Collaboration
A wide gulf has emerged between SOC and NOC teams that's keeping both of them from assuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of IT systems. Here's how experts think it should be bridged.
Flash Poll
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
New Best Practices for Secure App Development
The transition from DevOps to SecDevOps is combining with the move toward cloud computing to create new challenges - and new opportunities - for the information security team. Download this report, to learn about the new best practices for secure application development.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-0290
Published: 2017-05-09
NScript in mpengine in Microsoft Malware Protection Engine with Engine Version before 1.1.13704.0, as used in Windows Defender and other products, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service (type confusion and application crash) via crafted JavaScript code within ...

CVE-2016-10369
Published: 2017-05-08
unixsocket.c in lxterminal through 0.3.0 insecurely uses /tmp for a socket file, allowing a local user to cause a denial of service (preventing terminal launch), or possibly have other impact (bypassing terminal access control).

CVE-2016-8202
Published: 2017-05-08
A privilege escalation vulnerability in Brocade Fibre Channel SAN products running Brocade Fabric OS (FOS) releases earlier than v7.4.1d and v8.0.1b could allow an authenticated attacker to elevate the privileges of user accounts accessing the system via command line interface. With affected version...

CVE-2016-8209
Published: 2017-05-08
Improper checks for unusual or exceptional conditions in Brocade NetIron 05.8.00 and later releases up to and including 06.1.00, when the Management Module is continuously scanned on port 22, may allow attackers to cause a denial of service (crash and reload) of the management module.

CVE-2017-0890
Published: 2017-05-08
Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an inadequate escaping leading to a XSS vulnerability in the search module. To be exploitable a user has to write or paste malicious content into the search dialogue.

Dark Reading Radio
Archived Dark Reading Radio
In past years, security researchers have discovered ways to hack cars, medical devices, automated teller machines, and many other targets. Dark Reading Executive Editor Kelly Jackson Higgins hosts researcher Samy Kamkar and Levi Gundert, vice president of threat intelligence at Recorded Future, to discuss some of 2016's most unusual and creative hacks by white hats, and what these new vulnerabilities might mean for the coming year.