Security

10:10 AM
50%
50%

Chip and Quill: How EMV Will Increase Card Fraud in the U.S

There's a price to pay for being last to the global EMV party.

We’ve got a problem. A big one, actually.

EMV is going to increase card fraud in the U.S.

“Poppycock!” you say. “Jabberwocky!” you chortle. “EMV chips are much safer than magnetic stripes!”

Turns out there’s a price to pay for being last to the global EMV party -- and a high toll for doubting U.S. consumers’ ability to use PINs rather than signatures when EMV arrives in 2015.

Let me explain.

First, while the U.S. accounts for 25 percent of global card volume, it attracts 50 percent of all card fraud -- because we still rely on magnetic stripes and signatures in cursive to secure and verify card transactions.

Fun fact #1: Cursive was invented to prevent lifting your quill from the page and blotting ink all over your scroll. I’m not kidding. In response to better pen and ink technologies developed decades ago (not to mention word processing), schools are finally phasing out instruction in cursive writing.

Fun fact #2: In a very recent non-scientific study conducted only by me, I concluded that humans are incapable of reproducing signatures on point-of-sale (POS) terminals that don’t draw their sobriety into question -- not that it matters since no one’s checking them anyway. And since no one’s checking them, signatures are not a reliable source of identification, and they are completely useless in preventing lost-and-stolen card fraud.

Fun fact #3: We know from other countries’ experiences that while EMV will reduce counterfeit card fraud, it will also push fraudsters to the next weakest link: online (card-not-present) payments.

According to Aite, while counterfeit card fraud in the U.S. will fall $1.8 billion (-51 percent) to $1.77 billion between 2015 and 2018 due to EMV chips, online card (card-not-present or CNP) fraud will jump $3.3 billion (+106 percent) to $6.4 billion. That’s a projected net card fraud gain of $1.5 billion post EMV. This seems like a poor return on the $8 billion issuers and merchants are spending to deploy EMV.

And though counterfeit card fraud will be blunted by EMV, lost-and-stolen card fraud will remain unchecked in the U.S., as most issuers are going to market with chip-and-signature as the primary cardholder verification method (CVM) for their EMV cards. In fact, because of this, Aite projects lost-and-stolen card fraud to approach $1 billion by 2018.

Put another way, we’re leaving $1 billion of preventable card fraud on the table by migrating to “chip-and-quill” rather than chip-and-PIN EMV.

Even if U.S. issuers were to migrate directly to chip-and-PIN EMV next year, the approaching tsunami of CNP fraud will still drive a $500 million net gain in card fraud in the U.S. thru 2018, according to Aite’s predictions.

Some issuers may be cynical and point out that CNP fraud liability is borne by the merchant, so it won’t be the issuer’s problem. But that discounts the hassle and headache of chargebacks, and ignores the fact that we’re all affected as individual cardholders.

And this is why issuers are faced with a three-fold mandate.

First, forget about signatures. Americans are capable of using PINs to verify and secure EMV card transactions.

Second, tokenize now. Apple Pay, Visa Checkout, and other tokenization efforts will command impressive returns against the rising tide of CNP fraud by replacing card account numbers with digital tokens that are useless if accessed or breached.

Third, deputize your customers in the fight with real-time transactional alerts, and consider risk-based authentication schemes like Visa’s 3-D Secure.

To doubt the American consumer’s ability to PIN instead of sign is both silly and costly, especially when the real learning curve will be mastering the “dip and stay” of EMV terminals in a population trained to “dip and yank” at ATMs and gas stations across the country. That’s going to be fun to watch.

Lee Wetherington, AAP, is Director of Strategic Insight for ProfitStars, a division of Jack Henry & Associates. He directs the development of insight and strategy for the financial services industry at large. To this end, he creates programs, presentations, and articles ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Becca L
50%
50%
Becca L,
User Rank: Author
11/29/2014 | 3:06:51 PM
Why the doubt?
Am I the only one suprised by this universal doubt that Americans can't handle to PIN instead of sign? Agreed, there will be some interesting bumps in the road at the start, and there will probably be comedically simple colorful instructions near checkout during transition, but I don't feel I'm being overly optimistic when I say we can probably handle it.
Becca L
50%
50%
Becca L,
User Rank: Author
11/29/2014 | 3:01:54 PM
Jabberwocky
Jabberwocky- my new favorite exclamation.

Re: Fun Fact #2: I recently broke my right (dominant) wrist, and had to sign with the left. There were some fabulous scribbles drawn onto receipts that were a far cry from my usual flare of the pen. Never had a problem.
Greg MacSweeney
50%
50%
Greg MacSweeney,
User Rank: Author
11/25/2014 | 6:10:44 AM
Re: Chip and Quill
CNP fraud is big and getting bigger. As you point out, it already is the 'low-hanging fruit' for fraudsters. (And it is massive fruit, to say the least).
Jonathan_Camhi
50%
50%
Jonathan_Camhi,
User Rank: Author
11/23/2014 | 8:24:24 PM
Re: Chip and Quill
A recent study by Javelin projected that there will be a huge increase in CNP fraud over the enxt few years, regardless of whether or not EMV is adopted. The Javelin report said that the big increase in CNP fraud is going to be a result of a big rise in the number of online and mobile transactions that it predcited would occur in the next few years. That report also forecasted a much bigger drop in card-present fraud than Aite does.
AllenF848
50%
50%
AllenF848,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/22/2014 | 6:43:51 PM
Chip and Quill
Good article with interesting points.  I wonder if other analysts agree with AITE.  But most of all, i love the title and well made points regarding PIN.
AllenF848
50%
50%
AllenF848,
User Rank: Apprentice
11/22/2014 | 6:43:41 PM
Chip and Quill
Good article with interesting points.  I wonder if other analysts agree with AITE.  But most of all, i love the title and well made points regarding PIN.
Register for Bank Systems & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Bank Systems & Technology
BS&T's 2014 Elite 8 executives are leading their banks to success, whether it involves leveraging the cloud, modernizing core systems, or transforming into digital enterprises.
Slideshows
Video
Bank Systems & Technology Radio
Archived Audio Interviews
Join Bank Systems & Technology Associate Editor Bryan Yurcan, and guests Karen Massey and Jerry Silva from IDC Financial Insights, for a conversation about the firm's 11th annual FinTech rankings.